<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sovereignty on libcom.de</title>
		<link>https://www.libcom.de/en/tags/sovereignty/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Sovereignty on libcom.de</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-GB</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.libcom.de/en/tags/sovereignty/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Vendor Lock-in: When your IT works for someone else</title>
				<link>https://www.libcom.de/en/blog/vendor-lockin/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.libcom.de/en/blog/vendor-lockin/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Vendor lock-in rarely begins with a conscious decision.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Usually it begins with a nice offer. Free trial. Easy migration. Everything from one source. And two years later you discover: switching would take months, cost a fortune, and overwhelm the entire team.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is not an accident. That is the product.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-lock-in-actually-means&#34;&gt;What lock-in actually means&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Technical vendor lock-in means your IT infrastructure is so closely tailored to the tools and services of a single vendor that switching becomes unrealistically expensive or complex.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
